By Michael Gray
Table of Contents
Only one week to go to April 15.
If you want our help and we haven't received your information
yet, please send it to us immediately so that we can prepare
extensions and estimated tax vouchers for you. If we don't
have your information yet and you want an appointment to bring it
to us, please call 408-918-3161 to make an appointment now.
Return to Table of Contents
Extensions - and when you don't have the money to pay the tax
(This is a reprint from past newsletters.)
What do you do when you don't have the money to pay the tax?
My first recommendation is to file your income tax returns,
certified mail, by the initial filing date. One of the nastiest
penalties in the IRS's arsenal is for late filing - 5% per month
to a maximum of 25%. Some people who owe money don't file their
returns because they are afraid. THIS IS A HUGE MISTAKE! The best
approach is to be honest about your situation and work with the
tax authorities to resolve it.
When you file an extension, any balance of tax due when the tax
return is filed represents an exposure for the late filing
penalty.
Please don't misunderstand me. I regularly use extensions for my
clients and myself as a workload "safety valve". We often don't
have the information to complete a return by the due date. They
just aren't appropriate when there will be a significant balance
due that won't be paid by the original filing due date.
According to the Treasury regulations for the requirements to
file a valid automatic extension request, "an application for
extension must show the full amount properly estimated as tax for
the taxable year." (Reg. § 1.6081-4(a)(4).) The regulations
relating to reasonable cause for failure to file a tax return
state that if a taxpayer satisfies the requirement of showing the
full amount estimated as tax, the taxpayer has a reasonable cause
for failure to file during the extension period provided (1) the
excess of the amount of tax shown on the return over the amount
of tax paid by the original filing date (including the amount
paid with the extension form) is no greater than 10 percent of
the amount shown on the return (restated - 90% of the tax is paid
by the due date), and (2) any balance due shown on the return is
paid with the return. (Reg. § 301.6651-1(c)(3).)
(For California taxpayers, the extension is paperless so the
amount of the tax need not be stated. You are still required to
pay at least 90% of the tax by the original due date to avoid the
late filing penalty.)
If you have filed an income tax return for 2003, you can process
your federal extension electronically or by telephone - call 888-
796-1074 by April 15. Better call early to beat the rush! Mailing
a paper form is still acceptable and is the only way a person who
didn't file a 2003 income tax return can request an automatic
extension.
A taxpayer can still avoid the late filing penalty by
demonstrating a "reasonable cause," but this can be a hassle and
the taxpayer is at the mercy of the subjective judgment of a
representative of the tax authority.
Remember you may now pay income taxes using a credit card. Call
800-272-9829, or try the web site,
www.officialpayments.com. The extension for California is
1555. You can also call 888-729-1040. Maybe you can find a card
offering a low interest rate promotion that will work for your
situation.
Should you borrow using a margin account? In most cases, this is
not a good choice because of the exposure to margin calls if the
market declines.
Should you use an equity advance loan, secured by your principal
residence? In some cases it might be to your advantage, if you
can get a favorable interest rate. Remember interest for an
equity loan not used for a home improvement is only deductible on
a loan amount up to $100,000. This interest is not deductible
when computing the alternative minimum tax.
Remember that IRA accounts and even other retirement accounts can
be temporary sources of funds. Distributions from IRAs that
aren't minimum required distributions can be rolled over to
another IRA or returned to the same IRA within 60 days after a
withdrawal. This exception only applies to one rollover per year.
(You must wait more than one year after a rollover is completed
before making another one.)1
Certain distributions from other qualified plans can also be
rolled over within a 60-day period to an IRA or another qualified
plan.2 Using IRAs or qualified plans as a temporary source of
funds to pay taxes can be useful if the funds to complete the
rollover will soon be available, such as when there is a lockout
"window" that will soon be open. The cost of an error can be
high, because if the rollover isn't completed before 60 days have
expired, the distribution may be subject to tax as ordinary
income plus a 10% early distribution penalty.3
The IRS has a form for installment agreements, Form 9465. They
would prefer that you submit the form with your income tax
return. You can take up to five years to pay off your tax
liability. An advantage of arranging an installment agreement is
the penalty for late payment of tax is reduced from 1/2% per
month to 1/4% per month. In addition to penalties, interest is
charged for late tax payments. The interest rate is adjusted
quarterly. Recently, the rate has been five percent.
Another alternative is to make an Offer in Compromise, Form 656.
With this procedure, the IRS actually can reduce your tax based
on your ability to pay. You don't have to wait until you have
owed the tax a long time to use this procedure. I think it's best
to work with an attorney, CPA or enrolled agent when making an
Offer in Compromise. If the amount is large, an attorney is
probably the best choice.
Although it may provide relief from your other creditors,
bankruptcy doesn't offer much help for recent debts for income
taxes. When you make payments on your tax bill, be sure to
specify to apply the payments to taxes due. Penalties and
interest are dischargeable in bankruptcy, but income taxes
aren't.
It may be to your advantage to plan how to use regular tax or
alternative minimum tax capital loss carryovers or minimum tax
credit carryovers. You might need to generate capital gains,
which can be difficult when you're in financial distress.
Return to Table of Contents
First individual estimated tax payment is due April 15
(This is a reprint from past newsletters.)
Remember to review your estimated tax situation for 2005.
There is no estimated tax penalty provided the taxpayer pays at
least 90% of the tax (including AMT) on the current year's tax
return through withholding and/or equal quarterly estimated tax
payments.
For taxpayers who have no more than $150,000 of adjusted gross
income ($75,000 for married persons, filing separately) on the
previous year's income tax return, there is no penalty for
underpayment of estimated tax provided at least the income tax on
the previous year's income tax return (including AMT) is paid in
equal quarterly estimated tax payments plus withholding.4 For
taxpayers who have more than $150,000 of adjusted gross income
($75,000 for married persons, filing separately) on the previous
year's income tax return, there is no penalty for underpayment of
estimated tax provided at least, for 2005, 110% of the income tax
on the previous year's income tax return (including AMT) is paid
in equal quarterly estimated tax payments plus withholding.5
Taxpayers who have uneven income and deductions may also compute
their estimated tax on an "annualized" basis. You multiply the
year to date income and deductions to arrive at amounts for a
year, compute the tax for that amount, then pay amounts to
cumulatively pay in 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and 100% of those amounts. You
should probably get help from a professional tax return preparer
to do this.
Return to Table of Contents
SEC supports expensing options
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued guidelines for
expensing employee stock options. The guidance supports the
option expensing rules issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board and offers several models companies can choose
from to estimate the value of employee options. (Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107.)
Return to Table of Contents
Tax Court upholds IRS rejection of offer on AMT from ISO
The Tax Court held the IRS did not abuse its discretion in
rejecting an offer in compromise relating to an alternative
minimum tax liability resulting from exercising ISOs during 2000.
The taxpayer found himself in severe financial difficulty because
the value of his stock dropped sharply after he exercised the
option. In this case, his AMT liability exceeded $200,000.
After making a partial payment of the tax, the taxpayer submitted
an offer in compromise based on doubt as to collectibility. The
taxpayer claimed he has insufficient assets to pay the liability.
The IRS revenue officer found the taxpayer had sufficient assets
to pay the liability and rejected his offer.
The Tax Court sympathized with the taxpayer's situation, but said
the answer lies in corrective legislation, not with the IRS or
the courts. The IRS was reasonable in its conclusion that the
taxpayer could pay the liability over time.
(Speltz, (2005) 124 TC No. 9.)
Return to Table of Contents
Questions and Answers
Question
If a taxpayer exercises an ISO in 2001 and sells the shares in
2004, is the cost basis of the shares increased by any AMT paid
in 2001?
Answer
No. The AMT might be partially recovered through the minimum tax
credit. See Federal Form 8801 and the related instructions. The
tax basis of the stock is adjusted for the additional income
reported on the 2001 AMT schedule to prepare an AMT Schedule D,
thus creating an AMT vs. regular tax difference to report at line
16 of Form 6251, so the regular tax will exceed the tentative
minimum tax, permitting part of the minimum tax credit carryover
to be used.
Question
I exercised and held some ISOs in 2002 and paid Federal and
California AMT. In 2003, I moved from California to Colorado. I
sold the shares I purchased using the ISOS in 2004.
I am wondering if and how I can claim credit towards my Colorado
state taxes for my California AMT paid on the exercise of the
ISOs. Am I out of luck on this? Has there been any
clarification on this since you wrote about the problem in 2001?
Answer
I haven't seen anything to give you any comfort. To my
knowledge, Colorado won't allow a state tax credit for an AMT
paid in an earlier year for the exercise of an ISO when the stock
is sold for a capital gain in a later year. I'm not an expert on
Colorado taxes, so consider consulting with a local CPA.
Question
I was granted some stock options in 2000. I exercised the
options and the stock is sitting in a brokerage account. I have
a letter from the broker saying that I have AMT adjusted income.
What do I do with this income?
Answer
It sounds like you have exercised an incentive stock option. The
AMT income is reported on line 13 of Form 6251, Alternative
Minimum Tax - Individuals.
You don't seem to have a clue what you are dealing with. Maybe
you should hire a professional (like us) to help you.
Question
I exercised some ISOs in 1997 and 1998 and held the shares. The
ISOs were granted at least 5 years before I exercised them. I
didn't know anything about AMT at the time. Now I'm thinking
about selling the shares. I thought that if I held the shares
that long, I would just have to pay the 15% long-term capital
gains tax. Observations?
Answer
You have met the holding period requirements for regular tax
purposes. If the shares were vested when you exercised the
options, you should also meet the holding period requirements for
AMT. A question could be whether you are entitled to a basis
adjustment for the shares for AMT reporting. If you didn't
report any AMT adjustment when you exercised the ISOs, probably
not. So, you should be entitled to the 15% capital gains rate
for the sale.
Question
In reading your article, "The Amazing Disappearing AMT Credit"
you state "The minimum tax credit carryforward to 1999 at line 26
of the form is not the amount that will be available to reduce
the next year's regular tax. It will be reduced by the net
minimum tax on exclusion items in the 1999 income tax return."
This implies the calculation mixes last year's credit with this
year's net minimum tax on exclusion items. However, as I read
the 8801 form, the net minimum tax on exclusions from Part 1 is
based on last year's 6251 form. Have I missed something, or has
the 8801 form changed since 1999?
Answer
Thanks for pointing out that typographical error. It should have
read "It will be reduced by the net minimum tax on exclusion
items in the 1998 income tax return." We'll fix the article.
Meanwhile, look at the sample Form 8801 included with the
article, which illustrates the problem of the reduction of a
minimum tax credit carryover by exclusion items in an intervening
year.
Question
My husband's company "gave" him stock shares every year in his
ESOP. My husband never paid anything to the fund. Now the
employer wants to "buy back" the stock and dissolve the ESOP.
When they buy back the stock and my husband doesn't roll over the
funds into another plan, is there a penalty of 10%? Also, are
the taxes just computed by adding the amount into our regular
income? Are there any additional taxes?
Answer
You haven't given me enough details for me to give you a complete
answer. Assuming your husband is under age 59 1/2 and isn't
terminating his employment, the 10% penalty will apply if he
doesn't roll over the distribution. The regular tax will be
computed by adding the distribution to his other taxable income.
I highly recommend that you consider a trustee to trustee
transfer to an IRA to avoid withholding and to avoid tax on the
distribution.
Question
I work for a startup software company in Mountain View and have
ISOs granted on 11/10/03 and 11/1/04. On 11/16/04, I exercised
options from each grant that were un-vested. I think I forgot to
file an 83(b) election. Is there a way to find out?
If I didn't make the election, which of these statements that you
made would apply?
- "If the election is not made the preference isn't measured
until the restrictions lapse or the stock becomes vested", or
- "The IRS has said in regulations issued during August, 2004
that for regular tax reporting, Section 83 doesn't apply when an
ISO is exercised, so the Section 83(b) election is not effective
for regular tax purposes. The holding period starts on the date
of exercise for avoiding regular tax ordinary income at
disposition under the ISO rules."
In both exercises, the market value and the exercise price were
the same, so there should be no current taxable event. My
question is, on what date does any sale of these shares become
long-term gain? Did my failure to file an 83(b) election change
that date?
Answer
If you don't recall filing an 83(b) election, you probably
didn't, because you have to sign the form before it is mailed to
the IRS. Check with your plan administrator to see if the
company helped you with this.
Both of the statements you quoted are correct, the first for AMT
reporting, the second for regular tax reporting.
If you hold the stock more than two years after the grant dates
and more than two years after the exercise dates, you will
qualify for long-term capital gains reporting for regular tax
purposes.
Since you didn't make the election, you should report ordinary
income for the excess of the fair market value of the stock on
the vesting date over the option price as the shares vest on your
AMT schedule. The holding period for the shares on the AMT
schedule will be based on the dates the shares vest. You have a
mess on your hands.
Question
I work for the US subsidiary of a UK-based company. I was issued
share options under a UK incentive scheme 5 years ago, but I have
been a resident in the US for the last 3 years.
I believe that my option plan follows the requirements for ISO
options, but this is not explicitly stated in my plan and there
is no reference to any IRS regulations.
Could these options qualify as ISOs?
Answer
No. The plan must state that it is an ISO plan to qualify, and
any options that don't qualify as ISOs are non-qualified options.
Michael Gray regrets he can no longer answer emails personally.
He will answer selected questions in this newsletter.
Return to Table of Contents
Do you know about our other newsletter?
For general tax developments, tax planning ideas, business
development ideas and book reviews, subscribe to Michael Gray,
CPA's Tax & Business Insight at www.taxtrimmers.com.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this communication was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Return to Table of Contents
Consult with a tax advisor
For our readers who aren’t tax advisors, this newsletter is intended to alert you about tax issues that could affect you. It is not a substitute for advice from a professional tax advisor. You will find that getting advice from a qualified advisor is a worthwhile investment.
Tax advisors should view the newsletter as an alert to become aware of issues relating to employee stock options for further research and study.
Return to Table of Contents
(Michael Gray is the co-author of Employee Stock Options – A Strategic Planning Guide for the 21st Century Optionaire. You can order the book at www.amazon.com or www.barnesandnoble.com/ or buy it at Stacey’s Books.)
P.S.
To receive the next issue of Michael Gray, CPA's Option Alert with more employee stock option tax developments and answers to questions from our readers automatically via email, subscribe by filling out the form below.
1 Internal Revenue Code § 408(c)(3)
2 Internal Revenue Code § 402(c)
3 Internal Revenue Code § 72(t)
4 Internal Revenue Code § 6654(d)(1)
5 Internal Revenue Code § 6654(d)(1)(C)